CIPAA 2012: The Complete Guide to Malaysia CIPAA Adjudication Proceeding


This article aims to provide a full and comprehensive guide to the Malaysia CIPAA (Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012) Adjudication Proceeding.

In this article, we will address the WHAT, WHY, and HOW of CIPAA.

What is CIPAA 2012 – Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication 2012?

Read More: What is CIPAA? The requirement to launch a CIPAA Claim

CIPAA is a legislation enacted by the Parliament of Malaysia on 15.04.2014 which aims to facilitate timely payment and alleviate the cash flow in the construction industry by the introduction of “CIPAA Adjudication Proceeding”.

In the CIPAA Adjudication Proceeding, an “adjudicator” (similar to a judge in court proceeding / arbitrator in arbitration) will be appointed to decide on the parties’ dispute and to deliver the Adjudication Decision.

Why CIPAA 2012? The Advantages and Benefits of CIPAA

Read More: Advantages of CIPAA Adjudication

Speedy and Expeditious

CIPAA only takes about 80 – 95 working days to complete from its initiation until the delivery of the Adjudication Decision.

In comparison, a construction dispute could typically take up to 9 months – 18 months to complete in arbitration / court proceeding.

High Success Rate

The Claimant has extremely high success rate under the CIPAA regime. In 2017, AIAC recorded that a whooping 89.28% of the adjudication decision is rendered in favour of the Claimant.

No-Lose Situation: No positive counterclaim from the Respondent

The Claimant is in a “NO-LOSE” situation in a CIPAA Adjudication Proceeding.

The Respondent may only raise a cross-claim / counterclaim against the Claimant to ‘zerorise’ the CIPAA claim.

The High Court has confirmed that the Respondent is unable to obtain a positive award against the Claimant even if the Respondent’s cross-claim / counterclaim is greater than the Claimant’s claim.

Read More: Non-Paying Party can only ‘zerorize’ claim and will not have a positive claim against Unpaid Party

Pay Now, Argue Later

There is no avenue to appeal against the CIPAA Adjudication Decision.

The CIPAA Adjudication Decision is legally binding on the Losing Party and the Losing Party will have to “pay first” in accordance with the Adjudication Decision and “argued later” by way of court litigation or arbitration proceeding.

Conditional Payment Clause / Back-to-Back Payment Clause is void

Pursuant to Section 35 of CIPAA, any “conditional payment clause” in the construction contract is void in the CIPAA Adjudication Proceeding.

As such, the Respondent will not be able to use the “conditional payment clause” such as “pay-when-paid”, “back-to-back” clause as a defence against the CIPAA claim.

Read More:

  1. CASE UPDATE: Conditional Payment Clause is Void Only for the Purpose of CIPAA Proceeding
  2. CASE UPDATE: Conditional Payment Provision Shall Be Interpreted Widely and Shall Be Void under Section 35 of CIPAA if It Inhibits Cash Flow

How to launch CIPAA Claim: Requirement of CIPAA

CIPAA checklist _ CIPAA claim requirement _ Malaysia

1. There must be a Written Contract

Pursuant to Section 2 of CIPAA, CIPAA only applies if there is a “Written Contract”.

However, the contract needs NOT be a formal contract or signed contract.

The meaning of “written contract” is construed very loosely and includes letters, correspondences and even purchase orders (PO) and delivery order (DO) as per the guideline issued by the CIPAA’s administrative center, Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC).

2. There must be a Construction Contract

The Contract must relate to Construction Work or Construction Consultancy.

This includes any work which forms an integral part of, or are preparatory to or temporary for such works, including site clearance, soil investigation and improvement, earth-moving, excavation, laying of foundation, site restoration and landscaping.

It also includes the procurement of construction materials, equipment or workers.

3. The contract must be executed after 15.04.2014

CIPAA applies prospectively to only Written Construction Contract that was executed AFTER the enforcement of CIPAA, 15 April 2014.

Read More: CIPAA applies prospectively

4. The Construction Contract must relate to construction work carried out within wholly or partly in Malaysia.

CIPAA only applies to construction work or construction consultancy work that is carried out within Malaysia.

CIPAA Procedure & Timeline of CIPAA Process

CIPAA Adjudication Process Flowchart | CIPAA Procedure

CIPAA Proceeding is typically conducted by way of “paper hearing” and can be summarily divided into 2 stages:

  1. Claim Stages
  2. Adjudication Stages


At the claim stage, the contractor / consultant will be known as “unpaid party” and the employer will be known as the “non-paying party”.

1. Payment Claim (Form 1)

At the outset, the Unpaid Party will initiate CIPAA Proceeding by sending the ‘Payment Claim’ (Form 1) to the Non-Paying Party.

Pursuant to Section 5 of CIPAA, the Payment Claim shall entail the amount claimed, due date for payment, details of the claims, descriptions of the work or services.

Read More: Non-Compliance with the Basic and Essential Requirement of Payment Claim is Fatal

2. Payment Response (Form 2)

Following the receipt of Payment Claim, the Non-Paying Party has 10 working days to reply by way of ‘Payment Response’ pursuant to Section 6 of CIPAA.

In the Payment Response, the Non-Paying Party shall state the amount admitted or disputed and the reasons of disputing.

If the Non-Party fails to reply by Payment Response, the entire Payment Claim shall be deemed to be disputed.

Read More: The Failure to file CIPAA Payment Response does not preclude the raising of New Defences in Adjudication Response


If the Non-Paying Party did not reply to the Payment Claim (Form 1) / denied the Unpaid Party’s claim, the Unpaid Party shall then initiate the Adjudication Stage.

In the Adjudication Stage, an Adjudicator will be appointed to decide on the parties’ dispute and to deliver the Written Adjudication Decision within the stipulated timeline.

At this stage, the Unpaid Party will be known as “Claimant” and the Non-Paying Party will be known as “Respondent“.

3. Notice of Adjudication (Form 3)

The Unpaid Party may initiate the adjudication by way of Notice of Adjudication (Form 3) pursuant to Section 8 of CIPAA.

Procedurally, the Unpaid Party will have to submit both the Notice of Adjudication and the Notice to Register the Adjudication to the AIAC, and AIAC will proceed to assign an adjudication number to the dispute.

4. Appointment of adjudicator

Thereafter, an Adjudicator will be appointed to decide on the payment dispute.

The Adjudicator may either be appointed by mutual agreement or by the Director of AIAC if the parties fail to reach a consensus.

5. Adjudication Claim (Form 7)

Upon the acceptance of appointment by the Adjudicator, the Claimant shall serve and file the “Adjudication Claim” on the Respondent within 10 working days from the date of acceptance of appointment.

The Adjudication Claim shall clearly outline the nature and the description of the dispute, the remedy sought thereunder and enclose the supporting documents.

The Adjudication Claim shall also include the legal reasoning (authorities / case laws) and expert report (if necessary).

6. Adjudication Response (Form 8)

Upon the receipt of Adjudication Claim, the Respondent shall respond to the Adjudication Claim “Adjudication Response” within 10 working days.

Similarly, the Adjudication Response shall contain the detailed /defence, counterclaim(s) and/or set-off together with supporting documents.

7. Adjudication Reply (Form 9)

The Claimant may serve its Adjudication Reply within 5 working days from the receipt of Adjudication Claim.

Upon the receipt of Adjudication Response, the Claimant has a final opportunity to reply to the Respondent’s Adjudication Response within 5 working days.

Delivery of Adjudication Decision

Lastly, the Adjudicator will deliver the Adjudication Decision within 45 working days from the service of Adjudication Response / Adjudication Reply, whichever is later.

Cost of CIPAA & Adjudication Fee

CIPAA Cost | CIPAA Consulting | Malaysia

Read More: Costs of CIPAA and Recovery of Costs in CIPAA

Ordinarily, there are usually 3 types of costs incurable in a CIPAA Proceedings:

Adjudicator’s Fee

The parties will have to pay for the Adjudicator’s Fee in CIPAA Adjudication Proceeding.

The Adjudicator will invite both parties to deposit 50% of the Adjudicator’s Fee and Administrative Fee at equal shares to the AIAC. If the Respondent fails to make payment, the Adjudicator will proceed to invite the Claimant to deposit the remaining 50% of the Adjudicator’s Fee and Administrative Fee to AIAC.

If Adjudicator’s Fee is not fully paid, the Adjudicator is entitled to withhold the Adjudication Decision until and unless the full payment is deposited with the Director of AIAC.

The Adjudicator’s Standard Fee calculator is as below:


Administrative Fee

Over and above the Adjudicator’s Fee, the parties will also have to pay the Administrative Fee to the AIAC.

The Administrative Fee payable is calculated at 20% of the Adjudicator’s Fee pursuant to Schedule III of the AIAC Adjudication Rules & Procedure.

Recovery of Cost

The costs incurred in CIPAA Adjudication Proceeding such as Adjudicator’s Fee, Administrative Fee and Legal Fee/ Consultant Fee are recoverable in the event that the Claimant success in its claim.

In simple words, this mean that the losing party will have to pay costs to the wining party.

Enforcement of CIPAA Adjudication Decision

Enforcement of CIPAA Adjudication Decision_Enforce as judgment_Suspension_Direct Payment_Winding Up | CIPAA Consulting
Enforcement of CIPAA Adjudication Decision| CIPAA Consulting | Malaysia

Following the issuance of CIPAA Adjudication Decision, if the Losing Party refuses to pay the Adjudicated Sum to the Winning Party, the Winning Party may consider enforcing the Adjudication Decision by the following methods:-

Section 28: Enforcement of Adjudication as Judgment

One of the method to enforce an Adjudication Decision is to file an enforcement application in the High Court.  

Upon the granting of the High Court Order, the Winning Party may proceed to execute the Adjudication Decision using the available execution process under the Rules of Court 2012 by either:

  1. seizing and selling the property of the losing party by way of Writ of Seizure and Sale;
  2. Garnishing the money from the losing party’s Bank or other losing party’s debtor by way of Garnishee Proceeding;
  3. Issuing Judgment Debtor Summons;

Section 29: Suspension or Reduction of Rate of Progress of Performance

Alternatively, if the construction work is still underway and incomplete, the Winning Party may suspend or slow down the performance of its work if the Losing Party fails to honour the Adjudication Decision.  

In such circumstance, the suspension or slowing down of work will not be seen as a breach of contract and the Winning Party is even entitled for extension of time and to recover any loss and expense incurred arising from the suspension or slowing down of work.

Often time, the suspension or slowing down of work will exert a great deal of pressure to the Losing Party to pay the Adjudicated Sum as the Losing Party may potentially face the exposure of having to pay liquidated ascertained damages/ delay damages (LAD) to the Employer or the end purchasers (in the case of developer).

Section 30: Direct Payment by Principal

The Winning Party may also enforce the CIPAA Adjudication Decision by seeking direct payment from the Principal of the Losing Party pursuant to Section 30 of CIPAA.

By operation of Section 30 CIPAA, the Principal MUST make direct payment to the winning party if there is money due or payable by the Principal to the losing party notwithstanding that there is no privity of contract between the principal and the winning party.

See: Case Update: Principal is Legally Bound to make Direct Payment to Winning Party if there is Money Due and Payable

Winding Up Proceeding

Lastly, the Winning Party may also issue a Statutory Demand pursuant to Section 466 of Company Act 2016 (Statutory Demand) to the Losing Party based on the Adjudication Decision.

If the Losing Party fails to meet the statutory demand and make payment thereof within 21 days, the Winning Party may proceed to wind up the Losing Party’s company and liquidate its asset to pay the Adjudicated Sum.

See: CASE UPDATE: CIPAA Adjudication Decision as The Basis of Winding Up without Enforcement Application

Share this post

Submit your email address above to receive the latest news & updates on CIPAA.

*We do NOT send advertising emails to subscribers. 

Leave a Reply